Social contract

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract

This article is about the political and philosophical concept. For Rousseau's 1762 treatise on the concept, see The Social Contract. For other uses, see Social Contract (disambiguation).

In political philosophy the social contract or political contract is a theory or model, originating during the Age of Enlightenment, that typically addresses the questions of the origin of society and the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual.^[1] Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights. The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of social contract theory.
Although the antecedents of social contract theory are found in antiquity, in Greek and Stoic philosophy and Roman and Canon Law, as well as in the Biblical idea of the covenant, the heyday of the social contract was the mid-seventeenth to early nineteenth centuries, when it emerged as the leading doctrine of political legitimacy. The starting point for most social contract theories is a heuristic examination of the human condition absent from any political order that Thomas Hobbes termed the “state of nature”.^[2] In this condition, individuals' actions are bound only by their personal power and conscience. From this shared starting point social contract theorists seek to demonstrate, in different ways, why a rational individual would voluntarily consent to give up his or her natural freedom to obtain the benefits of political order.
Hugo Grotius (1625), Thomas Hobbes (1651), Samuel Pufendorf (1673), John Locke (1689), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1762) are among the most prominent of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century theorists of social contract and natural rights. Each solved the problem of political authority in a different way. Grotius posited that individual human beings had natural rights; Hobbes asserted that men consent to abdicate their rights in favor of the absolute authority of government (whether monarchial or parliamentary); Pufendorf disputed Hobbes's equation of a state of nature with war.^[3]
Locke believed that natural rights were inalienable, and that the rule of God therefore superseded government authority; and Rousseau believed that democracy (self-rule) was the best way of ensuring the general welfare while maintaining individual freedom under the rule of law. The Lockean concept of the social contract was invoked in the United States Declaration of Independence. Social contract theories were eclipsed in the nineteenth century in favor of utilitarianism, Hegelianism, and Marxism, and were revived in the twentieth, notably in the form of a thought experiment by John Rawls.^[4]

Contents

• 1 Overview
• 2 History
  • 2.1 Classical thought
  • 2.2 Renaissance developments
• 3 Philosophers
  • 3.1 Hugo Grotius (1625)
  • 3.2 Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan (1651)
  • 3.3 John Locke's Second Treatise of Government (1689)
  • 3.4 Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Du contrat social (1762)
  • 3.5 Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's individualist social contract (1851)
  • 3.6 John Rawls' Theory of Justice (1971)
  • 3.7 David Gauthier's Morals By Agreement (1986)
  • 3.8 Philip Pettit's Republicanism (1997)
• 4 Critical theories
  • 4.1 Consent of the governed
  • 4.2 Natural law and constitutionalism
  • 4.3 Tacit consent
  • 4.4 Voluntarism
• 5 See also
• 6 References
• 7 Further reading
• 8 External links