The Order of Things
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with The Order of Things (book by Barbara Ann Kipfer).
The Order of Things | |
---|---|
The 1994 Vintage Books edition |
|
Author(s) | Michel Foucault |
Original title | Les Mots et les choses |
Country | France |
Language | French |
Subject(s) | Philosophy |
Publisher | Éditions Gallimard |
Publication date | 1966 |
Published in English | 1970 |
Media type | Paperback |
Pages | 404 |
ISBN | 2-07-022484-8 |
OCLC Number | 256703056 |
Foucault endeavours to excavate the origins of the human sciences, particularly but not exclusively psychology and sociology. The book opens with an extended discussion of Diego Velázquez's painting Las Meninas and its complex arrangement of sightlines, hiddenness, and appearance. Then it develops its central claim: that all periods of history have possessed certain underlying conditions of truth that constituted what was acceptable as, for example, scientific discourse.
Foucault develops the notion of episteme, and argues that these conditions of discourse have changed over time, from one period's episteme to another. Foucault demonstrates parallels in the development of three fields: linguistics, biology, and economics.
Contents |
Influence
Foucault's critique has been influential in the field of cultural history.[1] The various shifts in consciousness that he points out in the first chapters of the book have led several scholars, such as Theodore Porter,[2] to scrutinize the bases for knowledge in our present day as well as to critique the projection of modern categories of knowledge onto subjects that remain intrinsically unintelligible, in spite of historical knowledge.Analysis
The Order of Things brought Foucault to prominence as an intellectual figure in France. A review by Jean-Paul Sartre attacked Foucault as "the last barricade of the bourgeoisie". Foucault responded, "Poor bourgeoisie; If they needed me as a 'barricade', then they had already lost power!"[3]Jean Piaget, in Structuralism, compared Foucault's episteme to Thomas Kuhn's notion of a paradigm.[4]
No comments:
Post a Comment